Young v King (No 8)

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Young v King (No. 8) [2015] NSWLEC 187 Hearing dates:30 November 2015Date of orders: 01 December 2015 Decision date: 01 December 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Sheahan J Decision: The Applicant’s claims for costs against the 8th, 9th, 10th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 18th Respondents are summarily dismissed, and, the Applicant is to pay those respondents’ costs on their motions for summary dismissal. Catchwords: COSTS: Applications for summary dismissal of costs claims made by an unsuccessful party against a number of non-parties. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 Married Persons (Equality of Status) Act 1996 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bankstown City Council v Mohamad El Dana [2009] NSWLEC 68 Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; 162 CLR 1 FPM Constructions v City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404 Harrison v Schipp [2001] NSWCA 13 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Re Felicity, FM v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (No 4) [2015] NSWCA 19 Reichel v Magrath [1889) 14 APP CAS 665 Rippon...