{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Won v Ashfield Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Won v Ashfield Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1201
Tags
No tags available
Case
Won v Ashfield Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1201
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Won v Ashfield Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1201 Hearing Date(s): 18 May and 1 June 2015 Date of Orders: 4 June 2015 Decision Date: 4 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore SC Decision: See (59) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: unsuccessful conciliation conference; continuing discussions between the parties; agreement on further modified proposal CONSENT ORDERS: leave to rely on amended plans; objections by local residents; objections largely relate to principal development not proposed modification; objections to amended modification proposal of limited nature; bulk when viewed from outside the site; amended proposal complies with controls; acoustic issues; expert evidence that amended proposal complies; consent orders made Legislation Cited: Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 2013 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Won (Applicant) Ashfield Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Sonter, solicitor (Applicant) Mr P Jackson, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (Applicant) Pikes and Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10126 of 2015 JUDGMENTINTRODUCTIONSENIOR COMMISSIONER: In July 2014, Hussey AC conducted a conciliation conference between the applicant and those representing and/or and advising him and Ashfield Council (the Council) and those representing and/or advertising it. That conciliation process was undertaken as part of the role of the Court in seeking, pursuant to s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) to assist the parties to proceedings in merit disputes in...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Won v Ashfield Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1201
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Won v Ashfield Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1201 Hearing Date(s): 18 May and 1 June 2015 Date of Orders: 4 June 2015 Decision Date: 4 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore SC Decision: See (59) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: unsuccessful conciliation conference; continuing discussions between the parties; agreement on further modified proposal CONSENT ORDERS: leave to rely on amended plans; objections by local residents; objections largely relate to principal development not proposed modification; objections to amended modification proposal of limited nature; bulk when viewed from outside the site; amended proposal complies with controls; acoustic issues; expert evidence that amended proposal complies; consent orders made Legislation Cited: Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 2013 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Won (Applicant) Ashfield Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Sonter, solicitor (Applicant) Mr P Jackson, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (Applicant) Pikes and Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10126 of 2015 JUDGMENTINTRODUCTIONSENIOR COMMISSIONER: In July 2014, Hussey AC conducted a conciliation conference between the applicant and those representing and/or and advising him and Ashfield Council (the Council) and those representing and/or advertising it. That conciliation process was undertaken as part of the role of the Court in seeking, pursuant to s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) to assist the parties to proceedings in merit disputes in...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>