Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission

[2014] HCA 43

Tags

No tags available

Case

Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission

[2014] HCA 43

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJWELLINGTON CAPITAL LIMITED  APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION & ANOR  RESPONDENTSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2014] HCA 435 November 2014S275/2013ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with N M Bender for the appellant (instructed by McCullough Robertson Lawyers)J T Gleeson SC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with J A Halley SC and D F C Thomas for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Securities and Investments Commission)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations – Managed investment schemes – Role of responsible entity under Ch 5C of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Construction of scheme constitution – Where responsible entity granted all powers "legally possible" for person or corporation to have – Where responsible entity made in specie distribution of scheme property to unit holders – Whether distribution beyond responsible entity's powers under scheme constitution.Trusts – Managed investment schemes – Responsible entity as statutory trustee –Whether general principles of law relating to trusts apply to responsible entity's functions under scheme constitution.Practice and procedure – Federal Court of Australia – Where Federal Court made declaration that responsible entity had no power under scheme constitution to distribute scheme property to unit holders – Where unit holders not represented in appeal – Whether Federal Court erred in...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission

[2014] HCA 43

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJWELLINGTON CAPITAL LIMITED  APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION & ANOR  RESPONDENTSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2014] HCA 435 November 2014S275/2013ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with N M Bender for the appellant (instructed by McCullough Robertson Lawyers)J T Gleeson SC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with J A Halley SC and D F C Thomas for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Securities and Investments Commission)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations – Managed investment schemes – Role of responsible entity under Ch 5C of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Construction of scheme constitution – Where responsible entity granted all powers "legally possible" for person or corporation to have – Where responsible entity made in specie distribution of scheme property to unit holders – Whether distribution beyond responsible entity's powers under scheme constitution.Trusts – Managed investment schemes – Responsible entity as statutory trustee –Whether general principles of law relating to trusts apply to responsible entity's functions under scheme constitution.Practice and procedure – Federal Court of Australia – Where Federal Court made declaration that responsible entity had no power under scheme constitution to distribute scheme property to unit holders – Where unit holders not represented in appeal – Whether Federal Court erred in...