{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2014] HCA 43
Tags
No tags available
Case
Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2014] HCA 43
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJWELLINGTON CAPITAL LIMITED APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION & ANOR RESPONDENTSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2014] HCA 435 November 2014S275/2013ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with N M Bender for the appellant (instructed by McCullough Robertson Lawyers)J T Gleeson SC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with J A Halley SC and D F C Thomas for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Securities and Investments Commission)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations – Managed investment schemes – Role of responsible entity under Ch 5C of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Construction of scheme constitution – Where responsible entity granted all powers "legally possible" for person or corporation to have – Where responsible entity made in specie distribution of scheme property to unit holders – Whether distribution beyond responsible entity's powers under scheme constitution.Trusts – Managed investment schemes – Responsible entity as statutory trustee –Whether general principles of law relating to trusts apply to responsible entity's functions under scheme constitution.Practice and procedure – Federal Court of Australia – Where Federal Court made declaration that responsible entity had no power under scheme constitution to distribute scheme property to unit holders – Where unit holders not represented in appeal – Whether Federal Court erred in...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2014] HCA 43
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJWELLINGTON CAPITAL LIMITED APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION & ANOR RESPONDENTSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2014] HCA 435 November 2014S275/2013ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with N M Bender for the appellant (instructed by McCullough Robertson Lawyers)J T Gleeson SC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with J A Halley SC and D F C Thomas for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Securities and Investments Commission)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSWellington Capital Limited v Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations – Managed investment schemes – Role of responsible entity under Ch 5C of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Construction of scheme constitution – Where responsible entity granted all powers "legally possible" for person or corporation to have – Where responsible entity made in specie distribution of scheme property to unit holders – Whether distribution beyond responsible entity's powers under scheme constitution.Trusts – Managed investment schemes – Responsible entity as statutory trustee –Whether general principles of law relating to trusts apply to responsible entity's functions under scheme constitution.Practice and procedure – Federal Court of Australia – Where Federal Court made declaration that responsible entity had no power under scheme constitution to distribute scheme property to unit holders – Where unit holders not represented in appeal – Whether Federal Court erred in...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>