{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1526
Tags
No tags available
Case
van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1526
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1526 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 1 October & 20 November 2015Date of orders: 10 December 2015 Decision date: 10 December 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Maston AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Lambert van der Heide (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr A. Knox, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) Ms K. Riding, City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):10551 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties,...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1526
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: van der Heide v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1526 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 1 October & 20 November 2015Date of orders: 10 December 2015 Decision date: 10 December 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Maston AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Lambert van der Heide (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr A. Knox, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) Ms K. Riding, City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):10551 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties,...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>