{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Tongue v Pittwater Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Tongue v Pittwater Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1338
Tags
No tags available
Case
Tongue v Pittwater Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1338
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tongue and anor v Pittwater Council [2015] NSWLEC 1338 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 17 July 2015Date of orders: 07 August 2015 Decision date: 07 August 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Gordon Arthur Tongue (Applicant 1) Kim Marie Williams (Applicant 2) Pitwater Council (Respondent 1) Lesley Megan Pitt (Respondent 2) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Briggs (Applicant 1 & 2) Ms O Adams (Respondent 1 & 2) Solicitors: DG Briggs & Associates (Applicant 1 & 2) King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent 1) Palmer Lawyers (Respondent 2) File Number(s):10039 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Tongue v Pittwater Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1338
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tongue and anor v Pittwater Council [2015] NSWLEC 1338 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 17 July 2015Date of orders: 07 August 2015 Decision date: 07 August 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Gordon Arthur Tongue (Applicant 1) Kim Marie Williams (Applicant 2) Pitwater Council (Respondent 1) Lesley Megan Pitt (Respondent 2) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Briggs (Applicant 1 & 2) Ms O Adams (Respondent 1 & 2) Solicitors: DG Briggs & Associates (Applicant 1 & 2) King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent 1) Palmer Lawyers (Respondent 2) File Number(s):10039 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>