Tomasy Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tomasy Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1263 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 14 March, 20 April, 30 May, 22 June 2016Date of orders: 24 June 2016 Decision date: 24 June 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Drying shed for food and organic waste; waste recycling activity; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Tomasy Pty Ltd (Applicant) Liverpool City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Nash (Respondent) Solicitors: Mr P Vergotis, McCabes Lawyers (Applicant) Mr I Lacy, Liverpool City Council (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/159512Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders...