{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1511
Tags
No tags available
Case
The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1511
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1511 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 8 July, 29 July, 17 August, 8, 29 September 2016Date of orders: 20 October 2016 Decision date: 20 October 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Tuor C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: ORDER: construct landscaping in accordance with approved landscape plan; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: The Owners of SP 91769 (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Ms P Murray, DibbsBarker (Applicant) Mr S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00153080Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an Order issued by Northern Beaches Council to construct landscaping in accordance with the approved landscape plan at 56-58 Gordon Street Manly Vale. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1511
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners of SP 91769 v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1511 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 8 July, 29 July, 17 August, 8, 29 September 2016Date of orders: 20 October 2016 Decision date: 20 October 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Tuor C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: ORDER: construct landscaping in accordance with approved landscape plan; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: The Owners of SP 91769 (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Ms P Murray, DibbsBarker (Applicant) Mr S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00153080Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an Order issued by Northern Beaches Council to construct landscaping in accordance with the approved landscape plan at 56-58 Gordon Street Manly Vale. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>