{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Tabet v Gett
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Tabet v Gett
[2010] HCA 12
Tags
No tags available
Case
Tabet v Gett
[2010] HCA 12
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGUMMOW ACJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJREEMA TABET (BY HER TUTOR GHASSAN SHEIBAN) APPELLANTANDDR MAURICE GETT RESPONDENTTabet v Gett [2010] HCA 1221 April 2010S259/2009ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales RepresentationB W Walker SC with J L A Lonergan and J Chambers for the appellant (instructed by Slater & Gordon Lawyers)N J Young QC with J K Kirk and K C Morgan for the respondent (instructed by Blake Dawson Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSTabet v GettNegligence – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Appellant suffered irreversible brain damage – Respondent's delay in providing proper treatment breached duty of care owed to appellant – Where not established on balance of probabilities that breach caused any part of brain damage – Where breach at most caused loss of less than 50% chance of better outcome – Whether law of tort recognises or should recognise loss of chance of better outcome as damage giving rise to liability in negligence – Relevance of policy considerations concerning extension of liability in medical negligence cases. Negligence – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Trial judge assessed as 40% the lost chance of better outcome – Court of Appeal found evidence supported no more than 15% chance of better outcome – Whether evidence sufficient to establish loss of chance of better outcome – Whether...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Tabet v Gett
[2010] HCA 12
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGUMMOW ACJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJREEMA TABET (BY HER TUTOR GHASSAN SHEIBAN) APPELLANTANDDR MAURICE GETT RESPONDENTTabet v Gett [2010] HCA 1221 April 2010S259/2009ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales RepresentationB W Walker SC with J L A Lonergan and J Chambers for the appellant (instructed by Slater & Gordon Lawyers)N J Young QC with J K Kirk and K C Morgan for the respondent (instructed by Blake Dawson Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSTabet v GettNegligence – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Appellant suffered irreversible brain damage – Respondent's delay in providing proper treatment breached duty of care owed to appellant – Where not established on balance of probabilities that breach caused any part of brain damage – Where breach at most caused loss of less than 50% chance of better outcome – Whether law of tort recognises or should recognise loss of chance of better outcome as damage giving rise to liability in negligence – Relevance of policy considerations concerning extension of liability in medical negligence cases. Negligence – Medical negligence – Damage – Loss of chance – Trial judge assessed as 40% the lost chance of better outcome – Court of Appeal found evidence supported no more than 15% chance of better outcome – Whether evidence sufficient to establish loss of chance of better outcome – Whether...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>