{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Sunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Sunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council
[2021] HCA 35
Tags
No tags available
Case
Sunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council
[2021] HCA 35
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,KEANE, GORDON, STEWARD AND GLEESON JJSUNLAND GROUP LIMITED & ANOR APPELLANTSANDGOLD COAST CITY COUNCIL RESPONDENTSunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council[2021] HCA 35Date of Hearing: 5 August 2021Date of Judgment: 10 November 2021B64/2020ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationS L Doyle QC with S J Webster and C M Doyle for the appellants (instructed by Holding Redlich)G J Gibson QC with M J Batty and A G Psaltis for the respondent (instructed by HopgoodGanim Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City CouncilLocal government – Town planning – Development approvals – Where second appellant purchased undeveloped parcel of land in 2015 – Where preliminary approval granted in 2007 for development project pursuant to Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld) – Where preliminary approval contained "conditions" regarding payment of infrastructure contributions by developers to respondent Council – Where development permits granted in 2016 – Where Integrated Planning Act introduced new regime permitting local governments to levy infrastructure charges by notice – Where s 6.1.31(2)(c) of Integrated Planning Act preserved as interim measure existing regime of imposing condition on development approval requiring infrastructure contributions – Where new regime maintained by Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) and Planning Act 2016 (Qld) – Where respondent Council issued infrastructure charges notices in accordance with new regime following issue of development permits – Whether conditions in preliminary...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Sunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council
[2021] HCA 35
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,KEANE, GORDON, STEWARD AND GLEESON JJSUNLAND GROUP LIMITED & ANOR APPELLANTSANDGOLD COAST CITY COUNCIL RESPONDENTSunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council[2021] HCA 35Date of Hearing: 5 August 2021Date of Judgment: 10 November 2021B64/2020ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationS L Doyle QC with S J Webster and C M Doyle for the appellants (instructed by Holding Redlich)G J Gibson QC with M J Batty and A G Psaltis for the respondent (instructed by HopgoodGanim Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City CouncilLocal government – Town planning – Development approvals – Where second appellant purchased undeveloped parcel of land in 2015 – Where preliminary approval granted in 2007 for development project pursuant to Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld) – Where preliminary approval contained "conditions" regarding payment of infrastructure contributions by developers to respondent Council – Where development permits granted in 2016 – Where Integrated Planning Act introduced new regime permitting local governments to levy infrastructure charges by notice – Where s 6.1.31(2)(c) of Integrated Planning Act preserved as interim measure existing regime of imposing condition on development approval requiring infrastructure contributions – Where new regime maintained by Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) and Planning Act 2016 (Qld) – Where respondent Council issued infrastructure charges notices in accordance with new regime following issue of development permits – Whether conditions in preliminary...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>