{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1094
Tags
No tags available
Case
Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1094
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1094 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 3 March 2015Date of orders: 02 April 2015 Decision date: 02 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION OF CONSENT: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Steve Caunt (Applicant) Shellharbour City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr M Mantei Planning Law Solutions Pty Ltd (Applicant) Mr D Baird Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):11077 of 2014Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1094
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Steve Caunt v Shellharbour City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1094 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 3 March 2015Date of orders: 02 April 2015 Decision date: 02 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION OF CONSENT: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Steve Caunt (Applicant) Shellharbour City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr M Mantei Planning Law Solutions Pty Ltd (Applicant) Mr D Baird Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):11077 of 2014Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>