{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1507
Tags
No tags available
Case
Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1507
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1507 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 23 November 2015Date of orders: 23 November 2015 Decision date: 23 November 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown ASC Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION: redevelopment of existing service station; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd (Applicant) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C McEwen SC (Applicant) Mr Colin McFadzean (Respondent) Solicitors: Rostron Carlyle Solicitors (Applicant) Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s):10699 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an application to modify Development Consent No: 14/1044 for the redevelopment of an existing service station at 61 Railway Avenue, Bundanoon. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1507
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1507 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 23 November 2015Date of orders: 23 November 2015 Decision date: 23 November 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown ASC Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION: redevelopment of existing service station; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Southern Highlands Petroleum Pty Ltd (Applicant) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C McEwen SC (Applicant) Mr Colin McFadzean (Respondent) Solicitors: Rostron Carlyle Solicitors (Applicant) Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s):10699 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an application to modify Development Consent No: 14/1044 for the redevelopment of an existing service station at 61 Railway Avenue, Bundanoon. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>