{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
SKA v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
SKA v The Queen
[2011] HCA 13
Tags
No tags available
Case
SKA v The Queen
[2011] HCA 13
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJSKA APPLICANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTSKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 134 May 2011S100/2010ORDER1.Special leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds 2, 3 and 4 of the amended draft notice of appeal dated 13 August 2010, but refused on grounds 1 and 5. 2.Appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 3.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dismissing the applicant's appeal against conviction to that Court made on 14 July 2009.4.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal for rehearing.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationH K Dhanji SC with C E Alexander for the applicant (instructed by Crawford & Duncan)D M L Woodburne SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSKA v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Appeal on ground jury verdict unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence – Application of test in M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal made independent assessment of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Video evidence – Where Court of Criminal Appeal relied on transcript of evidence – Whether sufficient to rely on transcript of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Trial judge's opinion – Where trial judge considered a jury acting reasonably could...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
SKA v The Queen
[2011] HCA 13
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJSKA APPLICANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTSKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 134 May 2011S100/2010ORDER1.Special leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds 2, 3 and 4 of the amended draft notice of appeal dated 13 August 2010, but refused on grounds 1 and 5. 2.Appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 3.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dismissing the applicant's appeal against conviction to that Court made on 14 July 2009.4.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal for rehearing.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationH K Dhanji SC with C E Alexander for the applicant (instructed by Crawford & Duncan)D M L Woodburne SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSKA v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Appeal on ground jury verdict unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence – Application of test in M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal made independent assessment of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Video evidence – Where Court of Criminal Appeal relied on transcript of evidence – Whether sufficient to rely on transcript of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Trial judge's opinion – Where trial judge considered a jury acting reasonably could...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>