SKA v The Queen

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

SKA v The Queen

[2011] HCA 13

Tags

No tags available

Case

SKA v The Queen

[2011] HCA 13

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJSKA  APPLICANTANDTHE QUEEN  RESPONDENTSKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 134 May 2011S100/2010ORDER1.Special leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds 2, 3 and 4 of the amended draft notice of appeal dated 13 August 2010, but refused on grounds 1 and 5. 2.Appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 3.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dismissing the applicant's appeal against conviction to that Court made on 14 July 2009.4.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal for rehearing.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationH K Dhanji SC with C E Alexander for the applicant (instructed by Crawford & Duncan)D M L Woodburne SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSKA v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Appeal on ground jury verdict unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence – Application of test in M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal made independent assessment of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Video evidence – Where Court of Criminal Appeal relied on transcript of evidence – Whether sufficient to rely on transcript of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Trial judge's opinion – Where trial judge considered a jury acting reasonably could...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

SKA v The Queen

[2011] HCA 13

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJSKA  APPLICANTANDTHE QUEEN  RESPONDENTSKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 134 May 2011S100/2010ORDER1.Special leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds 2, 3 and 4 of the amended draft notice of appeal dated 13 August 2010, but refused on grounds 1 and 5. 2.Appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 3.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dismissing the applicant's appeal against conviction to that Court made on 14 July 2009.4.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal for rehearing.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationH K Dhanji SC with C E Alexander for the applicant (instructed by Crawford & Duncan)D M L Woodburne SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSSKA v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Appeal on ground jury verdict unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence – Application of test in M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal made independent assessment of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Video evidence – Where Court of Criminal Appeal relied on transcript of evidence – Whether sufficient to rely on transcript of evidence.Criminal law – Appeal – Trial judge's opinion – Where trial judge considered a jury acting reasonably could...