{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Savell v Inner West Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Savell v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1517
Tags
No tags available
Case
Savell v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1517
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Savell v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1517 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 5, 26 October 2016Date of orders: 03 November 2016 Decision date: 03 November 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; alterations and additions to an approved but not constructed dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Jonathan Savell (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton, barrister (Applicant) Ms J McKelvey, barrister (Respondent) Solicitors: Mills Oakley Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00160765Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application D/2015/735 for alterations and additions to an approved but not constructed dwelling at 22 Charlotte Street Rozelle. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Savell v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1517
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Savell v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1517 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 5, 26 October 2016Date of orders: 03 November 2016 Decision date: 03 November 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; alterations and additions to an approved but not constructed dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Jonathan Savell (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton, barrister (Applicant) Ms J McKelvey, barrister (Respondent) Solicitors: Mills Oakley Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00160765Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application D/2015/735 for alterations and additions to an approved but not constructed dwelling at 22 Charlotte Street Rozelle. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>