{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1101
Tags
No tags available
Case
Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1101
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1101 Hearing dates:30 March 2015Decision date: 21 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: dwelling house, development standard for floor space ratio exceeded Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2009; State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land; State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 – Coastal Policy; State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191 Texts Cited: Wollongong Development Control Plan 2009 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Sarm Architects Pty Limited (Applicant) Wollongong City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr J McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) Mr J Reilly, Wollongong City Council File Number(s):11073 of 2014Judgment Sarm Architects Pty Limited lodged Development Application DA-2014/787 with Wollongong City Council on 10 July 2014 seeking consent to construct a two storey dwelling house and swimming pool at 8 Lighthorse Drive, Woonona. Council refused consent on 24 September 2014 and Sarm is appealing that decision. The main issues in the case are that the dwelling house exceeds the maximum Floor space ratio (FSR) and is inconsistent with a number of the council’s planning controls. The site and locality The site is legally described as Lot 41 in DP 207556 and is located on the eastern side of Lighthorse Drive...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1101
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sarm Architects Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1101 Hearing dates:30 March 2015Decision date: 21 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: dwelling house, development standard for floor space ratio exceeded Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2009; State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land; State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 – Coastal Policy; State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191 Texts Cited: Wollongong Development Control Plan 2009 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Sarm Architects Pty Limited (Applicant) Wollongong City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr J McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) Mr J Reilly, Wollongong City Council File Number(s):11073 of 2014Judgment Sarm Architects Pty Limited lodged Development Application DA-2014/787 with Wollongong City Council on 10 July 2014 seeking consent to construct a two storey dwelling house and swimming pool at 8 Lighthorse Drive, Woonona. Council refused consent on 24 September 2014 and Sarm is appealing that decision. The main issues in the case are that the dwelling house exceeds the maximum Floor space ratio (FSR) and is inconsistent with a number of the council’s planning controls. The site and locality The site is legally described as Lot 41 in DP 207556 and is located on the eastern side of Lighthorse Drive...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>