{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Saliba v City of Sydney Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Saliba v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1160
Tags
No tags available
Case
Saliba v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1160
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Saliba v City of Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1160 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 12 February & 18 March 2016Date of orders: 19 April 2016 Decision date: 19 April 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: use of existing garage as a secondary dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Paul Saliba (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr G. Hartley, Hartley Solicitors (Applicant) Mr A. Singh, City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):11054 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application no. D/2014/330 for the use of an existing garage as a secondary dwelling located at 30 Primrose Avenue, Rosebery In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Saliba v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1160
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Saliba v City of Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1160 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 12 February & 18 March 2016Date of orders: 19 April 2016 Decision date: 19 April 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: use of existing garage as a secondary dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Paul Saliba (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr G. Hartley, Hartley Solicitors (Applicant) Mr A. Singh, City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):11054 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application no. D/2014/330 for the use of an existing garage as a secondary dwelling located at 30 Primrose Avenue, Rosebery In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>