{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1244
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1244
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1244 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 7 April 2015Date of orders: 24 June 2015 Decision date: 24 June 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: APPEAL: appeal against Orders for upgrade of fire safety measures; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Rose Bay Marina Pty Limited (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Pickles, barrister (Applicant) Mr Anthony Hudson, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Macpherson Kelly Lawyers (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s):10882 of 2014Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Woollahra Council of modification application lot 1 DP 1171693, 594-596 New South Head Road, Rose Bay. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1244
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1244 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 7 April 2015Date of orders: 24 June 2015 Decision date: 24 June 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: APPEAL: appeal against Orders for upgrade of fire safety measures; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Rose Bay Marina Pty Limited (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Pickles, barrister (Applicant) Mr Anthony Hudson, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Macpherson Kelly Lawyers (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s):10882 of 2014Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Woollahra Council of modification application lot 1 DP 1171693, 594-596 New South Head Road, Rose Bay. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>