Robertson v Krabman

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robertson & anor v Krabman & anor [2016] NSWLEC 1280 Hearing dates:23 June 2016Date of orders: 05 July 2016 Decision date: 05 July 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Fakes C Decision: The application in its entirety is dismissed. Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] Damage to property; Hedge – obstruction of sunlight Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Granthum Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152 Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Trevor and Amanda Robertson (Applicants) Peter and Matilda Krabman (Respondents) Representation: Applicants: Ms A Hemmings (Barrister) Respondents: Dr P Krabman (Litigant in person)     Solicitors: Applicants: Hones Lawyers File Number(s):182509 of 2016Judgment COMMISSIONER:   The applicants have applied under both s 7 Part 2 and s 14B Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (Trees Act) for orders seeking removal of bamboo from the respondents’ property within 3m of the common boundary, and the payment, by the respondents, of $6,894.00 for rectification of damage to their property they contend has been caused by the bamboo. The respondents’ property is to the north of the applicants’ property. Along part of the southern boundary of the respondents’ property is a row of bamboo. The applicants contend that the bamboo has caused damaged to their dwelling and their lawn and could cause damage to a drain and...