{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd
[2019] HCA 13
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd
[2019] HCA 13
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJMatter No S143/2018BIANCA HOPE RINEHART & ANOR APPELLANTSANDHANCOCK PROSPECTING PTY LTD & ORS RESPONDENTSMatter No S144/2018BIANCA HOPE RINEHART & ANOR APPELLANTSANDGEORGINA HOPE RINEHART (IN HER PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE HOPE MARGARET HANCOCK TRUST AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE HFMF TRUST) & ORS RESPONDENTSRinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty LtdRinehart v Rinehart[2019] HCA 138 May 2019S143/2018 & S144/2018ORDERMatter No S143/20181.The appeal be dismissed with costs.2. The third party companies' application for special leave to cross-appeal be allowed.3.The cross-appeal be treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 4. Orders 5, 6 and 8 of the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 15 December 2017 be set aside and, in their place, it is ordered that: "5. The orders of the Court made on 26 May 2016 be set aside and in lieu thereof order: (a) that the proceeding brought in the Court by the applicants being NSD 1124 of 2014 be stayed under s 8(1) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) (CA Act) pending any arbitral reference between the parties or until further order, save and except for those claims made against Mulga Downs Investments Pty Ltd; and (b) the first and second applicants to the main proceedings (being the first and second respondents to the appeals) pay the costs of the moving parties to the interlocutory application filed on 3 November 2014 in proceedings NSD 1124 of 2014 in connection with...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd
[2019] HCA 13
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJMatter No S143/2018BIANCA HOPE RINEHART & ANOR APPELLANTSANDHANCOCK PROSPECTING PTY LTD & ORS RESPONDENTSMatter No S144/2018BIANCA HOPE RINEHART & ANOR APPELLANTSANDGEORGINA HOPE RINEHART (IN HER PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE HOPE MARGARET HANCOCK TRUST AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE HFMF TRUST) & ORS RESPONDENTSRinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty LtdRinehart v Rinehart[2019] HCA 138 May 2019S143/2018 & S144/2018ORDERMatter No S143/20181.The appeal be dismissed with costs.2. The third party companies' application for special leave to cross-appeal be allowed.3.The cross-appeal be treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed. 4. Orders 5, 6 and 8 of the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 15 December 2017 be set aside and, in their place, it is ordered that: "5. The orders of the Court made on 26 May 2016 be set aside and in lieu thereof order: (a) that the proceeding brought in the Court by the applicants being NSD 1124 of 2014 be stayed under s 8(1) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) (CA Act) pending any arbitral reference between the parties or until further order, save and except for those claims made against Mulga Downs Investments Pty Ltd; and (b) the first and second applicants to the main proceedings (being the first and second respondents to the appeals) pay the costs of the moving parties to the interlocutory application filed on 3 November 2014 in proceedings NSD 1124 of 2014 in connection with...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>