{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Rem Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Rem Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1149
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rem Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1149
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: REM Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1149 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 27 April 2015Date of orders: 11 May 2015 Decision date: 11 May 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: extractive industry; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: REM Gravel Pit Pty Ltd (Applicant) Bega Valley Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Peter Barber, solicitor(Applicant) Mr Michael Mantei, solicitor(Respondent) Solicitors: Eden Legal & Conveyancing (Applicant) Planning Law Solutions(Respondent) File Number(s):10955 of 2014Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Bega Valley Shire Council of Development Application No DA 2013/70 for an extractive industry at Lots 920 and 923 DP 1068957 South Wolumla Road, Wolumla. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Rem Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1149
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: REM Gravel Pit Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1149 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 27 April 2015Date of orders: 11 May 2015 Decision date: 11 May 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: extractive industry; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: REM Gravel Pit Pty Ltd (Applicant) Bega Valley Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Peter Barber, solicitor(Applicant) Mr Michael Mantei, solicitor(Respondent) Solicitors: Eden Legal & Conveyancing (Applicant) Planning Law Solutions(Respondent) File Number(s):10955 of 2014Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Bega Valley Shire Council of Development Application No DA 2013/70 for an extractive industry at Lots 920 and 923 DP 1068957 South Wolumla Road, Wolumla. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>