Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003

[2004] HCA 49

Tags

No tags available

Case

Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003

[2004] HCA 49

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJRE KIT WOOLLEY (MANAGER OF THE BAXTER IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE)& ANOR  RESPONDENTSEX PARTE: APPLICANTS M276/2003 BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND GS  PROSECUTORSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS[2004] HCA 497 October 2004M276/2003ORDERApplication dismissed.Representation:G Griffith QC with C J Horan and C M Harris for the prosecutors (instructed by Vadarlis & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with G R Kennett for the respondents and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)B W Walker SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Woolley;  Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GSImmigration – Detention – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("Migration Act"), ss 189 and 196 – Whether detention of children authorised by Migration Act – Whether children may request release from detention under Migration Act, s 198 – Whether detention valid if children unable to request release – Relevance of international jurisprudence and parens patriae jurisdiction.Constitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of the Commonwealth – Immigration detention – Whether Migration Act, ss 189 and 196 validly require detention of children – Whether legislation reasonably capable of being seen as necessary for the purposes of reception, investigation, admission or deportation...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003

[2004] HCA 49

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJRE KIT WOOLLEY (MANAGER OF THE BAXTER IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE)& ANOR  RESPONDENTSEX PARTE: APPLICANTS M276/2003 BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND GS  PROSECUTORSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS[2004] HCA 497 October 2004M276/2003ORDERApplication dismissed.Representation:G Griffith QC with C J Horan and C M Harris for the prosecutors (instructed by Vadarlis & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with G R Kennett for the respondents and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)B W Walker SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Woolley;  Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GSImmigration – Detention – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("Migration Act"), ss 189 and 196 – Whether detention of children authorised by Migration Act – Whether children may request release from detention under Migration Act, s 198 – Whether detention valid if children unable to request release – Relevance of international jurisprudence and parens patriae jurisdiction.Constitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of the Commonwealth – Immigration detention – Whether Migration Act, ss 189 and 196 validly require detention of children – Whether legislation reasonably capable of being seen as necessary for the purposes of reception, investigation, admission or deportation...