{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003
[2004] HCA 49
Tags
No tags available
Case
Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003
[2004] HCA 49
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJRE KIT WOOLLEY (MANAGER OF THE BAXTER IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE)& ANOR RESPONDENTSEX PARTE: APPLICANTS M276/2003 BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND GS PROSECUTORSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS[2004] HCA 497 October 2004M276/2003ORDERApplication dismissed.Representation:G Griffith QC with C J Horan and C M Harris for the prosecutors (instructed by Vadarlis & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with G R Kennett for the respondents and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)B W Walker SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GSImmigration – Detention – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("Migration Act"), ss 189 and 196 – Whether detention of children authorised by Migration Act – Whether children may request release from detention under Migration Act, s 198 – Whether detention valid if children unable to request release – Relevance of international jurisprudence and parens patriae jurisdiction.Constitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of the Commonwealth – Immigration detention – Whether Migration Act, ss 189 and 196 validly require detention of children – Whether legislation reasonably capable of being seen as necessary for the purposes of reception, investigation, admission or deportation...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003
[2004] HCA 49
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJRE KIT WOOLLEY (MANAGER OF THE BAXTER IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE)& ANOR RESPONDENTSEX PARTE: APPLICANTS M276/2003 BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND GS PROSECUTORSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GS[2004] HCA 497 October 2004M276/2003ORDERApplication dismissed.Representation:G Griffith QC with C J Horan and C M Harris for the prosecutors (instructed by Vadarlis & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with G R Kennett for the respondents and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)B W Walker SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 by their next friend GSImmigration – Detention – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("Migration Act"), ss 189 and 196 – Whether detention of children authorised by Migration Act – Whether children may request release from detention under Migration Act, s 198 – Whether detention valid if children unable to request release – Relevance of international jurisprudence and parens patriae jurisdiction.Constitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of the Commonwealth – Immigration detention – Whether Migration Act, ss 189 and 196 validly require detention of children – Whether legislation reasonably capable of being seen as necessary for the purposes of reception, investigation, admission or deportation...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>