{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002
[2002] HCA 39
Tags
No tags available
Case
Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002
[2002] HCA 39
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIRBY JIN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION AGAINST THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENTEX PARTE APPLICANT S190 OF 2002 APPLICANT/PROSECUTORRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002[2002] HCA 3919 August 2002S190/2002ORDER1. Application refused with costs.2. Certify for the attendance of counsel.Representation:S E J Prince for the applicant/prosecutor (instructed by the applicant/prosecutor)S B Lloyd for the respondent (instructed by Clayton Utz)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002Immigration – Refugees and protection visas – Constitutional writs of prohibition and mandamus sought against officers of the Commonwealth – Decision of officer of a federal department not to refer to the Minister a request to make a further application in Australia for a protection visa after an earlier such application has failed – Whether such non-reference was arguably manifestly unreasonable – Ministerial guidelines – Minister has no duty under Act to consider whether to exercise the power – Inferences available from the evidence – Appearance of applicant's name on electronic report of Federal Court decision – Subsequent enactment of legislative prohibition on identification of applicants for refugee status.Practice – High Court – Application for orders nisi for constitutional writs – Application to add further party – Sufficiency of evidence to establish reasonably arguable...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Re Minister for Immigration; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002
[2002] HCA 39
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIRBY JIN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION AGAINST THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENTEX PARTE APPLICANT S190 OF 2002 APPLICANT/PROSECUTORRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002[2002] HCA 3919 August 2002S190/2002ORDER1. Application refused with costs.2. Certify for the attendance of counsel.Representation:S E J Prince for the applicant/prosecutor (instructed by the applicant/prosecutor)S B Lloyd for the respondent (instructed by Clayton Utz)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S190 of 2002Immigration – Refugees and protection visas – Constitutional writs of prohibition and mandamus sought against officers of the Commonwealth – Decision of officer of a federal department not to refer to the Minister a request to make a further application in Australia for a protection visa after an earlier such application has failed – Whether such non-reference was arguably manifestly unreasonable – Ministerial guidelines – Minister has no duty under Act to consider whether to exercise the power – Inferences available from the evidence – Appearance of applicant's name on electronic report of Federal Court decision – Subsequent enactment of legislative prohibition on identification of applicants for refugee status.Practice – High Court – Application for orders nisi for constitutional writs – Application to add further party – Sufficiency of evidence to establish reasonably arguable...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>