Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJRE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND                  FIRST RESPONDENTMULTICULTURAL AFFAIRSEX PARTE APPLICANT S20/2002  PROSECUTORRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs;Ex parte Applicant S20/2002[2003] HCA 3017 June 2003S20/2002ORDERApplication dismissed with costs, including any reserved costs.Representation:B W Walker SC with L J Karp for the prosecutor (instructed by McDonells Solicitors)S J Gageler SC with G R Kennett for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)No appearance for the second respondent.Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJAPPELLANT S106/2002  APPELLANTANDMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND   RESPONDENTMULTICULTURAL AFFAIRSAppellant S106/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs17 June 2003S106/2002ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentation:B W Walker SC with L J Karp for the appellant (instructed by McDonells Solicitors)S J Gageler SC with G R Kennett for the respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSRe Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002Appellant S106/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural AffairsImmigration – Refugees – Temporary protection visas – Application for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus under s 75(v) of the Constitution – Where Refugee Review Tribunal found that applicant was an unreliable witness and discounted evidence said to be corroborative – Whether Tribunal's decision was "irrational, illogical and not based upon...