Rail Corporation New South Wales v Hurstville City Council

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rail Corporation New South Wales v Hurstville City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1105 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 17 April 2015Date of orders: 17 April 2015 Decision date: 17 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: APPEAL: section 121B Order; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Rail Corporation New South Wales (Applicant) Hurstville City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Solicitors: Ms E Wild, Henry Davis York (Applicant) Ms R Knapman, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent) File Number(s):10195 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required...