{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
R v Keenan
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
R v Keenan
[2009] HCA 1
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Keenan
[2009] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIRBY, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDFRANCIS ROBERT KEENAN RESPONDENTThe Queen v Keenan[2009] HCA 12 February 2009B23/20081.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 11 December 2007 and, in their place, order that the appeal against conviction to that Court be dismissed.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland to determine the application for leave to appeal against sentence. On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationW Sofronoff QC, Solicitor-General of the State of Queensland with R G Martin SC for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))B W Walker SC with A J Kimmins for the respondent (instructed by Potts Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v KeenanCriminal law – Criminal responsibility – Criminal Code (Q), s 8 provided that, where common intention to prosecute unlawful purpose, and in prosecution of such purpose offence committed of such a nature that commission was a probable consequence of prosecution of unlawful purpose, each person deemed to have committed offence – Meaning of "offence … of such a nature" – Whether "offence … of such a nature" limited to precise acts committed.Criminal law – Criminal responsibility – Nature of connection between unlawful purpose and offence ultimately committed – Determination of unlawful purpose – Relevance of means by which offence committed – Whether...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Keenan
[2009] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIRBY, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDFRANCIS ROBERT KEENAN RESPONDENTThe Queen v Keenan[2009] HCA 12 February 2009B23/20081.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 11 December 2007 and, in their place, order that the appeal against conviction to that Court be dismissed.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland to determine the application for leave to appeal against sentence. On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationW Sofronoff QC, Solicitor-General of the State of Queensland with R G Martin SC for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))B W Walker SC with A J Kimmins for the respondent (instructed by Potts Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v KeenanCriminal law – Criminal responsibility – Criminal Code (Q), s 8 provided that, where common intention to prosecute unlawful purpose, and in prosecution of such purpose offence committed of such a nature that commission was a probable consequence of prosecution of unlawful purpose, each person deemed to have committed offence – Meaning of "offence … of such a nature" – Whether "offence … of such a nature" limited to precise acts committed.Criminal law – Criminal responsibility – Nature of connection between unlawful purpose and offence ultimately committed – Determination of unlawful purpose – Relevance of means by which offence committed – Whether...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>