{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
R v Guode
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
R v Guode
[2020] HCA 8
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Guode
[2020] HCA 8
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDAKON GUODE RESPONDENTThe Queen v Guode[2020] HCA 8Date of Hearing: 14 November 2019Date of Judgment: 18 March 2020M75/2019ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 16 August 2018. 3.Quash the sentences imposed by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 16 August 2018. 4.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria for further determination according to law. On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationK E Judd QC with A S Ellis for the appellant (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Vic))O P Holdenson QC with C A Boston and L V Drago for the respondent (instructed by Stary Norton Halphen)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v GuodeCriminal law – Sentence – Irrelevant consideration – Where respondent pleaded guilty to murder contrary to common law and to infanticide and attempted murder contrary to ss 6(1) and 321M of Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) respectively – Where primary judge sentenced respondent to 26 years and six months' imprisonment with non-parole period of 20 years – Where Court of Appeal allowed appeal against sentence and re-sentenced respondent to 18 years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 14 years – Where respondent's mental condition at time of offending called for application of principles stated in...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Guode
[2020] HCA 8
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDAKON GUODE RESPONDENTThe Queen v Guode[2020] HCA 8Date of Hearing: 14 November 2019Date of Judgment: 18 March 2020M75/2019ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 16 August 2018. 3.Quash the sentences imposed by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 16 August 2018. 4.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria for further determination according to law. On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationK E Judd QC with A S Ellis for the appellant (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Vic))O P Holdenson QC with C A Boston and L V Drago for the respondent (instructed by Stary Norton Halphen)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v GuodeCriminal law – Sentence – Irrelevant consideration – Where respondent pleaded guilty to murder contrary to common law and to infanticide and attempted murder contrary to ss 6(1) and 321M of Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) respectively – Where primary judge sentenced respondent to 26 years and six months' imprisonment with non-parole period of 20 years – Where Court of Appeal allowed appeal against sentence and re-sentenced respondent to 18 years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 14 years – Where respondent's mental condition at time of offending called for application of principles stated in...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>