{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
R v Gee
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
R v Gee
[2003] HCA 12
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Gee
[2003] HCA 12
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDROBERT GORDON POLLYBANK GEE RESPONDENTSAND ANORThe Queen v Gee[2003] HCA 1213 March 2003A61/2002ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2. Set aside order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia made on 14 March 2001.3. Remit proceeding to the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia for further hearing and determination in accordance with the decision of this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of South AustraliaRepresentation:C J Kourakis QC with D Petraccaro for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth))B W Walker SC with A L Tokley and S D Ower for the first respondent (instructed by Jon Lister)S W Tilmouth QC with N M Hurley for the second respondent (instructed by Noelle Hurley)Intervener:B M Selway QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia, with C D Bleby intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by the Crown Solicitor for the State of South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v GeeCriminal Law – Jurisdiction – Exercise of federal jurisdiction by state Supreme Courts – Offences against laws of the Commonwealth – Where s 350 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) provides for the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia to hear and determine questions of law reserved by the District Court – Whether s 68(2) of...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
R v Gee
[2003] HCA 12
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJTHE QUEEN APPELLANTANDROBERT GORDON POLLYBANK GEE RESPONDENTSAND ANORThe Queen v Gee[2003] HCA 1213 March 2003A61/2002ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2. Set aside order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia made on 14 March 2001.3. Remit proceeding to the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia for further hearing and determination in accordance with the decision of this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of South AustraliaRepresentation:C J Kourakis QC with D Petraccaro for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth))B W Walker SC with A L Tokley and S D Ower for the first respondent (instructed by Jon Lister)S W Tilmouth QC with N M Hurley for the second respondent (instructed by Noelle Hurley)Intervener:B M Selway QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia, with C D Bleby intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by the Crown Solicitor for the State of South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v GeeCriminal Law – Jurisdiction – Exercise of federal jurisdiction by state Supreme Courts – Offences against laws of the Commonwealth – Where s 350 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) provides for the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia to hear and determine questions of law reserved by the District Court – Whether s 68(2) of...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>