R v Baden-Clay

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

R v Baden-Clay

[2016] HCA 35

Tags

No tags available

Case

R v Baden-Clay

[2016] HCA 35

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,KIEFEL, BELL, KEANE AND GORDON JJTHE QUEEN  APPELLANTANDGERARD ROBERT BADEN-CLAY  RESPONDENTThe Queen v Baden-Clay[2016] HCA 3531 August 2016B33/2016ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside orders 1 and 2 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 8 December 2015, and in their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationW Sofronoff QC with D C Boyle and S J Hedge for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))M J Byrne QC with M J Copley QC for the respondent (instructed by Peter Shields Lawyers)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v Baden‑ClayCriminal law – Criminal liability – Where respondent's wife disappeared and body later found – Where respondent involved in sexual affair with another woman – Where some injuries to respondent's cheek likely caused by fingernails – Where respondent gave evidence at trial denying involvement in killing wife and disposing of body – Where jury convicted respondent of murder – Where Court of Appeal held hypothesis of unintentional killing not excluded by prosecution and substituted verdict of manslaughter – Where common ground on appeal that respondent killed his wife – Whether hypothesis consistent with innocence of murder open – Whether jury's verdict unreasonable – Whether jury entitled to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that respondent acted with intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm when he killed...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

R v Baden-Clay

[2016] HCA 35

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,KIEFEL, BELL, KEANE AND GORDON JJTHE QUEEN  APPELLANTANDGERARD ROBERT BADEN-CLAY  RESPONDENTThe Queen v Baden-Clay[2016] HCA 3531 August 2016B33/2016ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside orders 1 and 2 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 8 December 2015, and in their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationW Sofronoff QC with D C Boyle and S J Hedge for the appellant (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))M J Byrne QC with M J Copley QC for the respondent (instructed by Peter Shields Lawyers)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSThe Queen v Baden‑ClayCriminal law – Criminal liability – Where respondent's wife disappeared and body later found – Where respondent involved in sexual affair with another woman – Where some injuries to respondent's cheek likely caused by fingernails – Where respondent gave evidence at trial denying involvement in killing wife and disposing of body – Where jury convicted respondent of murder – Where Court of Appeal held hypothesis of unintentional killing not excluded by prosecution and substituted verdict of manslaughter – Where common ground on appeal that respondent killed his wife – Whether hypothesis consistent with innocence of murder open – Whether jury's verdict unreasonable – Whether jury entitled to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that respondent acted with intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm when he killed...