Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment

[2012] HCA 58

Tags

No tags available

Case

Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment

[2012] HCA 58

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJTHE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION AMALGAMATED OF NSW  APPELLANTANDDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & ORS                 RESPONDENTSThe Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment[2012] HCA 5812 December 2012S127/2012ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Industrial Court of New South WalesRepresentationD F Jackson QC with A A Hatcher SC and M Gibian for the appellant (instructed by W G McNally Jones Staff Lawyers)M G Sexton SC, Solicitor-General for the State of New South Wales with J G Renwick SC and A M Mitchelmore for the first to fourth respondents (instructed by Crown Solicitor (NSW))Submitting appearance for the fifth respondentIntervenersM G Hinton QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia with J C Cox intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor (SA))S G E McLeish SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria with K E Foley intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (instructed by Victorian Government Solicitor)S G E McLeish SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria with G J D del Villar intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the State of Queensland (instructed by Crown Law (Qld))G R Donaldson SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Western Australia with F B Seaward intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by State Solicitor (WA))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment

[2012] HCA 58

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJTHE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION AMALGAMATED OF NSW  APPELLANTANDDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & ORS                 RESPONDENTSThe Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated of NSW v Director of Public Employment[2012] HCA 5812 December 2012S127/2012ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Industrial Court of New South WalesRepresentationD F Jackson QC with A A Hatcher SC and M Gibian for the appellant (instructed by W G McNally Jones Staff Lawyers)M G Sexton SC, Solicitor-General for the State of New South Wales with J G Renwick SC and A M Mitchelmore for the first to fourth respondents (instructed by Crown Solicitor (NSW))Submitting appearance for the fifth respondentIntervenersM G Hinton QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia with J C Cox intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor (SA))S G E McLeish SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria with K E Foley intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (instructed by Victorian Government Solicitor)S G E McLeish SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria with G J D del Villar intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General of the State of Queensland (instructed by Crown Law (Qld))G R Donaldson SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Western Australia with F B Seaward intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by State Solicitor (WA))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is...