{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1153
Tags
No tags available
Case
Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1153
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1153 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 19 January, 16 February, 8 March 2016Date of orders: 14 April 2016 Decision date: 14 April 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: entertainment facility; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd (Applicant) Hawksbury City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) Ms J McCullan, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):10959 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application No. 0703/13 for an entertainment facility and associated facilities at 8 Groves Avenue, Mulgrave In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1153
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd v Hawksbury City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1153 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 19 January, 16 February, 8 March 2016Date of orders: 14 April 2016 Decision date: 14 April 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: entertainment facility; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Planet Warriewood Pty Ltd (Applicant) Hawksbury City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) Ms J McCullan, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):10959 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application No. 0703/13 for an entertainment facility and associated facilities at 8 Groves Avenue, Mulgrave In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>