{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Pickering v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Pickering v The Queen
[2017] HCA 17
Tags
No tags available
Case
Pickering v The Queen
[2017] HCA 17
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJRODNEY PETER PICKERING APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTPickering v The Queen[2017] HCA 173 May 2017B68/2016ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 6 May 2016, and in its place order that: (a) the appeal be allowed;(b) the appellant's conviction be quashed; and (c) a new trial be had.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationM J Copley QC with C J Grant for the appellant (instructed by Anderson Telford Lawyers)M R Byrne QC with G J Cummings for the respondent (instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSPickering v The QueenCriminal law – Justification and excuse – Resisting actual and unlawful violence threatened to person – Where appellant stabbed deceased – Where appellant acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter – Where s 31(1) of Criminal Code (Q) not left to jury – Whether appellant able to rely on s 31(1) to deny criminal responsibility in relation to offence of manslaughter – Whether s 31(2) renders s 31(1) unavailable wherever evidence discloses that act of accused constitutes offence described in s 31(2) regardless of charge.Words and phrases – "act", "criminally responsible", "liable to punishment", "offence".Criminal Code (Q), s 31.KIEFEL CJ AND NETTLE J. The appellant was tried in the Supreme Court of Queensland for the murder of Ivan John Owens ("the deceased"). ...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Pickering v The Queen
[2017] HCA 17
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJRODNEY PETER PICKERING APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTPickering v The Queen[2017] HCA 173 May 2017B68/2016ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 6 May 2016, and in its place order that: (a) the appeal be allowed;(b) the appellant's conviction be quashed; and (c) a new trial be had.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentationM J Copley QC with C J Grant for the appellant (instructed by Anderson Telford Lawyers)M R Byrne QC with G J Cummings for the respondent (instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSPickering v The QueenCriminal law – Justification and excuse – Resisting actual and unlawful violence threatened to person – Where appellant stabbed deceased – Where appellant acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter – Where s 31(1) of Criminal Code (Q) not left to jury – Whether appellant able to rely on s 31(1) to deny criminal responsibility in relation to offence of manslaughter – Whether s 31(2) renders s 31(1) unavailable wherever evidence discloses that act of accused constitutes offence described in s 31(2) regardless of charge.Words and phrases – "act", "criminally responsible", "liable to punishment", "offence".Criminal Code (Q), s 31.KIEFEL CJ AND NETTLE J. The appellant was tried in the Supreme Court of Queensland for the murder of Ivan John Owens ("the deceased"). ...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>