{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
O'Connor v Kerr
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
O'Connor v Kerr
[2015] NSWLEC 1285
Tags
No tags available
Case
O'Connor v Kerr
[2015] NSWLEC 1285
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O’Connor v Kerr [2015] NSWLEC 1285 Hearing dates:29 July 2015Date of orders: 29 July 2015 Decision date: 29 July 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Fakes C Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] Future damage; Hedge – possible obstruction of sunlight Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Deville & anor v Frith & anor [2014] NSWLEC 1002 Hinde v Anderson & anor [2009] NSWLEC 1148 Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 192 McCallum v Riodan & anor [2011] NSWLEC 1009 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152 Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29 Wisdom v Payn [2011] NSWLEC 1012 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Zangari v Miller (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 1093 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Mr R O’Connor (Applicant) Ms N Kerr (Respondent) Representation: Applicant: Mr R O’Connor (Litigant in person) Respondent: Ms P Wright (Solicitor) Solicitors: Respondent: PJ Donnellan & Co Solicitors File Number(s):20436 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: The applicant owns a property in Wyoming in the Gosford local government area. He has applied under both s 7 Part 2 and s 14B Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act) for orders for either the removal or pruning of trees growing on an adjoining property. The orders are sought on the basis of future damage the trees may cause and obstruction of sunlight. The trees in question comprise seven Pyrus calleryana ‘Capital’ (Ornamental Pear) (Trees 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7,...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
O'Connor v Kerr
[2015] NSWLEC 1285
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O’Connor v Kerr [2015] NSWLEC 1285 Hearing dates:29 July 2015Date of orders: 29 July 2015 Decision date: 29 July 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Fakes C Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] Future damage; Hedge – possible obstruction of sunlight Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Deville & anor v Frith & anor [2014] NSWLEC 1002 Hinde v Anderson & anor [2009] NSWLEC 1148 Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 192 McCallum v Riodan & anor [2011] NSWLEC 1009 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152 Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29 Wisdom v Payn [2011] NSWLEC 1012 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Zangari v Miller (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 1093 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Mr R O’Connor (Applicant) Ms N Kerr (Respondent) Representation: Applicant: Mr R O’Connor (Litigant in person) Respondent: Ms P Wright (Solicitor) Solicitors: Respondent: PJ Donnellan & Co Solicitors File Number(s):20436 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: The applicant owns a property in Wyoming in the Gosford local government area. He has applied under both s 7 Part 2 and s 14B Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act) for orders for either the removal or pruning of trees growing on an adjoining property. The orders are sought on the basis of future damage the trees may cause and obstruction of sunlight. The trees in question comprise seven Pyrus calleryana ‘Capital’ (Ornamental Pear) (Trees 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7,...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>