Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd

[2003] HCA 35

Tags

No tags available

Case

Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd

[2003] HCA 35

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJNEAT DOMESTIC TRADING PTY LIMITED  APPELLANTANDAWB LIMITED & ANOR  RESPONDENTSNEAT Domestic Trading Pty Limited v AWB Limited[2003] HCA 3519 June 2003S225/2002ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentation:S J Gageler SC with J K Kirk for the appellant (instructed by Withnell Hetherington)A Robertson SC with A I Tonking for the respondents (instructed by Allens Arthur Robinson)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSNEAT Domestic Trading Pty Limited v AWB LimitedAdministrative law – Judicial review – Statutory scheme regulating export of wheat – Consent of statutory authority required for export – Authority precluded from giving consent without approval of nominated company incorporated under Corporations Law – Whether company's withholding of approval was decision of an administrative character made under an enactment – Whether in withholding approval nominated company exercised discretionary power in accordance with a rule or policy without regard to merits of particular case. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 3(1), 5(2)(f), 6(2)(f).Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 51(1).Wheat Marketing Act 1989 (Cth), ss 57(1), (1A), (3A), (3B), (6), (7).GLEESON CJ.   This appeal concerns a statutory scheme regulating the export of wheat, and the administrative law principles governing the role in that scheme of a corporation representing growers' interests.The regulatory scheme took effect from 1 July 1999.  The background, and the government policy, were set out in an Explanatory Memorandum relating to...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd

[2003] HCA 35

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJNEAT DOMESTIC TRADING PTY LIMITED  APPELLANTANDAWB LIMITED & ANOR  RESPONDENTSNEAT Domestic Trading Pty Limited v AWB Limited[2003] HCA 3519 June 2003S225/2002ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentation:S J Gageler SC with J K Kirk for the appellant (instructed by Withnell Hetherington)A Robertson SC with A I Tonking for the respondents (instructed by Allens Arthur Robinson)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSNEAT Domestic Trading Pty Limited v AWB LimitedAdministrative law – Judicial review – Statutory scheme regulating export of wheat – Consent of statutory authority required for export – Authority precluded from giving consent without approval of nominated company incorporated under Corporations Law – Whether company's withholding of approval was decision of an administrative character made under an enactment – Whether in withholding approval nominated company exercised discretionary power in accordance with a rule or policy without regard to merits of particular case. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 3(1), 5(2)(f), 6(2)(f).Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 51(1).Wheat Marketing Act 1989 (Cth), ss 57(1), (1A), (3A), (3B), (6), (7).GLEESON CJ.   This appeal concerns a statutory scheme regulating the export of wheat, and the administrative law principles governing the role in that scheme of a corporation representing growers' interests.The regulatory scheme took effect from 1 July 1999.  The background, and the government policy, were set out in an Explanatory Memorandum relating to...