Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council)

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council)

[2016] NSWLEC 1302

Tags

No tags available

Case

Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council)

[2016] NSWLEC 1302

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council) [2016] NSWLEC 1302 Hearing dates:4-5 June and 6 July, 2015, 11 and 26 April 2016Date of orders: 21 July 2016 Decision date: 21 July 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: O’Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld.2. Development Application No. 2014/0928 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a childcare centre for 37 children at 45 Ogilvy Street, Peakhurst is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 2, 6, 11, 10, A, D, K, N, W, X and Y, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: childcare centre for 37 children; appearance and colour scheme; acoustic impacts; number of car parking spaces provided on-site; adequacy of landscaping and outdoor play areas; stormwater disposal. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Emad and Eva Nada (Applicant) Hurstville City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Kondilios solicitor (Applicant) Dr S. Berveling barrister (Respondent)   Solicitors: Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/167898 (formerly 11040 of 2014)Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2014/0928 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a childcare centre for 37 children and 7 staff, with 8 car parking spaces (the proposal),...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council)

[2016] NSWLEC 1302

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Nada v Georges River Council (formerly Hurstville City Council) [2016] NSWLEC 1302 Hearing dates:4-5 June and 6 July, 2015, 11 and 26 April 2016Date of orders: 21 July 2016 Decision date: 21 July 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: O’Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld.2. Development Application No. 2014/0928 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a childcare centre for 37 children at 45 Ogilvy Street, Peakhurst is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 2, 6, 11, 10, A, D, K, N, W, X and Y, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: childcare centre for 37 children; appearance and colour scheme; acoustic impacts; number of car parking spaces provided on-site; adequacy of landscaping and outdoor play areas; stormwater disposal. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Emad and Eva Nada (Applicant) Hurstville City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Kondilios solicitor (Applicant) Dr S. Berveling barrister (Respondent)   Solicitors: Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/167898 (formerly 11040 of 2014)Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2014/0928 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a childcare centre for 37 children and 7 staff, with 8 car parking spaces (the proposal),...