{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
MRR v GR
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
MRR v GR
[2010] HCA 4
Tags
No tags available
Case
MRR v GR
[2010] HCA 4
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HAYNE, KIEFEL AND BELL JJMRR APPELLANTANDGR RESPONDENTMRR v GR [2010] HCA 4Date of Order: 3 December 2009Date of Publication of Reasons: 3 March 2010B44/2009ORDER1.The appeal from the whole of the judgment and orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia given and made on 15 May 2009 be allowed.2.The orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia made on 15 May 2009 be set aside and in their place order that:(a)the appeal by the mother against the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia made on 1 April 2008 be allowed;(b)the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia made on 1 April 2008 be set aside; (c)the matter be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia for rehearing de novo.On appeal from the Family Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with L A R Goodchild for the appellant (instructed by Neisha Shepherd Solicitor)G K W Page SC with T D Betts for the respondent (instructed by Rod Madsen)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMRR v GRFamily law – Children – Parenting orders – Section 60CA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes "best interests of the child" paramount consideration when making parenting order – Section 61DA(1) provides presumption that equal shared parental responsibility in best interests of child – Section 65DAA requires court to consider whether child spending equal, or...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
MRR v GR
[2010] HCA 4
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HAYNE, KIEFEL AND BELL JJMRR APPELLANTANDGR RESPONDENTMRR v GR [2010] HCA 4Date of Order: 3 December 2009Date of Publication of Reasons: 3 March 2010B44/2009ORDER1.The appeal from the whole of the judgment and orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia given and made on 15 May 2009 be allowed.2.The orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia made on 15 May 2009 be set aside and in their place order that:(a)the appeal by the mother against the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia made on 1 April 2008 be allowed;(b)the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia made on 1 April 2008 be set aside; (c)the matter be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia for rehearing de novo.On appeal from the Family Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with L A R Goodchild for the appellant (instructed by Neisha Shepherd Solicitor)G K W Page SC with T D Betts for the respondent (instructed by Rod Madsen)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMRR v GRFamily law – Children – Parenting orders – Section 60CA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes "best interests of the child" paramount consideration when making parenting order – Section 61DA(1) provides presumption that equal shared parental responsibility in best interests of child – Section 65DAA requires court to consider whether child spending equal, or...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>