{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic
[2023] HCA 43
Tags
No tags available
Case
Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic
[2023] HCA 43
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, STEWARD, GLEESON AND JAGOT JJMITSUBISHI MOTORS AUSTRALIA LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDZELKO BEGOVIC RESPONDENTMitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic[2023] HCA 43Date of Hearing: 2 August 2023Date of Judgment: 13 December 2023M17/2023ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside orders 2 and 3 made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 5 August 2022 and, in lieu thereof, order that:(a)the appeal be allowed; and(b)the respondent's application to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal be dismissed. 3.The appellants pay the respondent's costs of the application for special leave to appeal and the appeal to this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationB W Walker SC with B M Gibson for the appellants (instructed by Thomson Geer Lawyers)C A Moore SC with J T Gottschall for the respondent (instructed by Shine Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic Trade practices – Consumer protection – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Where vehicle purchased with fuel consumption label applied in compliance with Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth) and Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 81/02 – Fuel Consumption Labelling for Light Vehicles) 2008 (Cth) – Where specific contents of label prescribed by law – Where evidence of fuel consumption of vehicle substantially exceeding fuel consumption values on label – Where proceedings commenced claiming appellants engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct, contravening s 18 of Australian Consumer Law – Whether appellants...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic
[2023] HCA 43
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, STEWARD, GLEESON AND JAGOT JJMITSUBISHI MOTORS AUSTRALIA LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDZELKO BEGOVIC RESPONDENTMitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic[2023] HCA 43Date of Hearing: 2 August 2023Date of Judgment: 13 December 2023M17/2023ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside orders 2 and 3 made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 5 August 2022 and, in lieu thereof, order that:(a)the appeal be allowed; and(b)the respondent's application to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal be dismissed. 3.The appellants pay the respondent's costs of the application for special leave to appeal and the appeal to this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationB W Walker SC with B M Gibson for the appellants (instructed by Thomson Geer Lawyers)C A Moore SC with J T Gottschall for the respondent (instructed by Shine Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Begovic Trade practices – Consumer protection – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Where vehicle purchased with fuel consumption label applied in compliance with Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth) and Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 81/02 – Fuel Consumption Labelling for Light Vehicles) 2008 (Cth) – Where specific contents of label prescribed by law – Where evidence of fuel consumption of vehicle substantially exceeding fuel consumption values on label – Where proceedings commenced claiming appellants engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct, contravening s 18 of Australian Consumer Law – Whether appellants...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>