{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB
[2004] HCA 32
Tags
No tags available
Case
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB
[2004] HCA 32
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS APPELLANTANDSGLB RESPONDENTMinister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB[2004] HCA 3217 June 2004A256/2003ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2.Orders of the Federal Court of Australia made on 11 March 2003, to the extent that they relate to the appeal to that Court from the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court made on 20 December 2002, set aside (save that as to costs). In place thereof, order that the appeal to that Court against the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court is dismissed.3. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs in this Court.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentation:S J Gageler SC with S B Lloyd for the appellant (instructed by Sparke Helmore)S Walsh QC with S C Churches for the respondent (instructed by Refugee Advocacy Service of South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMinister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLBImmigration – Refugees – Procedural fairness – Refugee Review Tribunal – Jurisdictional error – Expert medical advice – Psychological state of applicant assumed to be possible explanation for unsatisfactory evidence – Whether denial of procedural fairness by failing to order further psychological assessment of applicant – Whether denial of procedural fairness by accepting that applicant suffered stress disorder – Whether denial of procedural fairness by acceptance of effects of disorder on applicant without expert medical advice.Statutes –...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB
[2004] HCA 32
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS APPELLANTANDSGLB RESPONDENTMinister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB[2004] HCA 3217 June 2004A256/2003ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2.Orders of the Federal Court of Australia made on 11 March 2003, to the extent that they relate to the appeal to that Court from the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court made on 20 December 2002, set aside (save that as to costs). In place thereof, order that the appeal to that Court against the orders of the Federal Magistrates Court is dismissed.3. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs in this Court.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentation:S J Gageler SC with S B Lloyd for the appellant (instructed by Sparke Helmore)S Walsh QC with S C Churches for the respondent (instructed by Refugee Advocacy Service of South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMinister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLBImmigration – Refugees – Procedural fairness – Refugee Review Tribunal – Jurisdictional error – Expert medical advice – Psychological state of applicant assumed to be possible explanation for unsatisfactory evidence – Whether denial of procedural fairness by failing to order further psychological assessment of applicant – Whether denial of procedural fairness by accepting that applicant suffered stress disorder – Whether denial of procedural fairness by acceptance of effects of disorder on applicant without expert medical advice.Statutes –...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>