Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa

[2021] HCA 1

Tags

No tags available

Case

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa

[2021] HCA 1

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION  APPELLANTANDLIKUMBO MAKASA  RESPONDENTMinister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa[2021] HCA 1Date of Hearing: 12 November 2020Date of Order: 12 November 2020Date of Publication of Reasons: 3 February 2021S103/2020ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationG T Johnson SC with N D J Swan for the appellant (instructed by Sparke Helmore Lawyers)A Ahmad with J D Donnelly for the respondent (instructed by Morning Star Legal & Migration Pty Ltd)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMinister for Immigration and Border Protection v MakasaImmigration – Visas – Visa cancellation – Character test – Substantial criminal record – Where delegate of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection ("Minister") cancelled respondent's visa on character grounds under s 501(2) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") made decision under s 43(1)(c)(i) of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) to set aside delegate's decision and substitute a decision not to cancel visa – Where Minister purported to re‑exercise discretion to cancel visa – Whether Minister can re-exercise discretion on same factual basis in circumstances where AAT earlier decided not to cancel visa.Words and phrases – "Administrative Appeals Tribunal", "character test", "different factual basis", "finality to the administrative decision-making process", "from time to time as occasion requires", "general power", "ministerial override", "nature of merits review", "powers of AAT", "reasonable...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa

[2021] HCA 1

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION  APPELLANTANDLIKUMBO MAKASA  RESPONDENTMinister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa[2021] HCA 1Date of Hearing: 12 November 2020Date of Order: 12 November 2020Date of Publication of Reasons: 3 February 2021S103/2020ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationG T Johnson SC with N D J Swan for the appellant (instructed by Sparke Helmore Lawyers)A Ahmad with J D Donnelly for the respondent (instructed by Morning Star Legal & Migration Pty Ltd)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMinister for Immigration and Border Protection v MakasaImmigration – Visas – Visa cancellation – Character test – Substantial criminal record – Where delegate of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection ("Minister") cancelled respondent's visa on character grounds under s 501(2) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") made decision under s 43(1)(c)(i) of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) to set aside delegate's decision and substitute a decision not to cancel visa – Where Minister purported to re‑exercise discretion to cancel visa – Whether Minister can re-exercise discretion on same factual basis in circumstances where AAT earlier decided not to cancel visa.Words and phrases – "Administrative Appeals Tribunal", "character test", "different factual basis", "finality to the administrative decision-making process", "from time to time as occasion requires", "general power", "ministerial override", "nature of merits review", "powers of AAT", "reasonable...