{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd
[2010] HCA 31
Tags
No tags available
Case
Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd
[2010] HCA 31
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJMILLER & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE BROKING PTY LTD APPLICANTANDBMW AUSTRALIA FINANCE LIMITED RESPONDENTMiller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Limited[2010] HCA 3129 September 2010M69/2009ORDER1. Special leave to appeal granted.2.Amended draft notice of appeal dated 19 January 2010 treated as filed in the appeal, and appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed with costs.3.Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 11 June 2009 and, in lieu thereof, order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationJ J Gleeson SC with G Crafti for the applicant (instructed by Minter Ellison)A C Archibald QC with M A Robins for the respondent (instructed by Francis V Gallichio Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMiller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance LimitedTrade practices – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Non-disclosure – Representation by supply of certificate of insurance and/or non-disclosure of nature of insurance – Whether provision of certificate by insurance broker to experienced premium lender misrepresented cancellability of underlying policy – Whether failure of broker to inform lender in terms that policy was non-cancellable constituted misleading or deceptive conduct.Appeal – Powers of appellate court – Review of trial judge's findings of fact – Where finding allegedly based on mistaken understanding of agreed...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd
[2010] HCA 31
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJMILLER & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE BROKING PTY LTD APPLICANTANDBMW AUSTRALIA FINANCE LIMITED RESPONDENTMiller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Limited[2010] HCA 3129 September 2010M69/2009ORDER1. Special leave to appeal granted.2.Amended draft notice of appeal dated 19 January 2010 treated as filed in the appeal, and appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed with costs.3.Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 11 June 2009 and, in lieu thereof, order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationJ J Gleeson SC with G Crafti for the applicant (instructed by Minter Ellison)A C Archibald QC with M A Robins for the respondent (instructed by Francis V Gallichio Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMiller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance LimitedTrade practices – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Non-disclosure – Representation by supply of certificate of insurance and/or non-disclosure of nature of insurance – Whether provision of certificate by insurance broker to experienced premium lender misrepresented cancellability of underlying policy – Whether failure of broker to inform lender in terms that policy was non-cancellable constituted misleading or deceptive conduct.Appeal – Powers of appellate court – Review of trial judge's findings of fact – Where finding allegedly based on mistaken understanding of agreed...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>