{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1457
Tags
No tags available
Case
Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1457
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2016] NSWLEC 1457 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 27 September 2016 Date of Orders: 29 September 2016 Decision Date: 29 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [6] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL - s97(1) against deemed refusal - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I, Hemmings SC, (Applicant) Solicitors: M Peatman, Hunt & Hunt (Applicant) S Turner, Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00212037 Publication Restriction: No JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against the deemed refusal of development application (D/2015/734) for the substantial demolition of the rear of the existing dwelling, alternations and additions, construction of a basement, tree removal, remediation, pool and site landscaping at 118 Louisa Road Birchgrove.The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 27 September 2016, in accordance with the provisions of s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). During the conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the LEC Act was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties.As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1457
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited v Inner West Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2016] NSWLEC 1457 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 27 September 2016 Date of Orders: 29 September 2016 Decision Date: 29 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [6] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL - s97(1) against deemed refusal - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milestone (Aust) Pty Limited (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I, Hemmings SC, (Applicant) Solicitors: M Peatman, Hunt & Hunt (Applicant) S Turner, Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00212037 Publication Restriction: No JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against the deemed refusal of development application (D/2015/734) for the substantial demolition of the rear of the existing dwelling, alternations and additions, construction of a basement, tree removal, remediation, pool and site landscaping at 118 Louisa Road Birchgrove.The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 27 September 2016, in accordance with the provisions of s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). During the conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the LEC Act was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties.As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>