Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton

[2023] HCA 1

Tags

No tags available

Case

Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton

[2023] HCA 1

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, GORDON, EDELMAN AND STEWARD JJMETAL MANUFACTURES PTY LIMITED  APPELLANTANDGAVIN MORTON AS LIQUIDATOR OF MJ WOODMAN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) & ANOR  RESPONDENTSMetal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton[2023] HCA 1Date of Hearing: 12 October 2022Date of Judgment: 8 February 2023B19/2022ORDER1. Appeal dismissed. 2.The costs of this appeal be costs in the cause.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationJ T Gleeson SC with G P McNally SC and J W Pokoney for the appellant (instructed by Breene & Breene Solicitors)J D McKenna KC with P E O'Brien for the respondents (instructed by Taylor David Lawyers)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMetal Manufactures Pty Limited v MortonCorporations – Winding up – Insolvency – Set-off – Unfair preferences – Where appellant received payments from company within six-month period prior to winding up – Where liquidator of company sought to recover payments from appellant under s 588FF(1)(a) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("Act") as unfair preferences under s 588FA of Act – Where appellant owed separate and distinct debt by company – Whether set-off under s 553C(1) of Act available to appellant against liquidator's claim for recovery of unfair preferences.Words and phrases – "commencement of the winding up", "contingent right", "insolvency", "insolvent transaction", "liquidation", "liquidator's duties and powers", "mutual dealing", "mutuality", "pari passu principle", "set-off", "statutory scheme of liquidation", "unfair preference", "voidable transaction", "winding up".Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 474, 477, 478,...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton

[2023] HCA 1

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,GAGELER, GORDON, EDELMAN AND STEWARD JJMETAL MANUFACTURES PTY LIMITED  APPELLANTANDGAVIN MORTON AS LIQUIDATOR OF MJ WOODMAN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) & ANOR  RESPONDENTSMetal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton[2023] HCA 1Date of Hearing: 12 October 2022Date of Judgment: 8 February 2023B19/2022ORDER1. Appeal dismissed. 2.The costs of this appeal be costs in the cause.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationJ T Gleeson SC with G P McNally SC and J W Pokoney for the appellant (instructed by Breene & Breene Solicitors)J D McKenna KC with P E O'Brien for the respondents (instructed by Taylor David Lawyers)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMetal Manufactures Pty Limited v MortonCorporations – Winding up – Insolvency – Set-off – Unfair preferences – Where appellant received payments from company within six-month period prior to winding up – Where liquidator of company sought to recover payments from appellant under s 588FF(1)(a) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("Act") as unfair preferences under s 588FA of Act – Where appellant owed separate and distinct debt by company – Whether set-off under s 553C(1) of Act available to appellant against liquidator's claim for recovery of unfair preferences.Words and phrases – "commencement of the winding up", "contingent right", "insolvency", "insolvent transaction", "liquidation", "liquidator's duties and powers", "mutual dealing", "mutuality", "pari passu principle", "set-off", "statutory scheme of liquidation", "unfair preference", "voidable transaction", "winding up".Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 474, 477, 478,...