{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1304
Tags
No tags available
Case
Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1304
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1304 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 12 May 2016 and 29 June 2016Date of orders: 19 July 2016 Decision date: 19 July 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: ORDER: use of building for secondary dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Maygood Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) Willoughby City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC (Applicant) Mr T Messenger, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: DC Balog & Associates (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00165449Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an Order concerning the unauthorised use of a building as a secondary dwelling at 40 Claude Street Chatswood. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1304
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1304 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 12 May 2016 and 29 June 2016Date of orders: 19 July 2016 Decision date: 19 July 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: ORDER: use of building for secondary dwelling; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Maygood Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) Willoughby City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC (Applicant) Mr T Messenger, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: DC Balog & Associates (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00165449Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against an Order concerning the unauthorised use of a building as a secondary dwelling at 40 Claude Street Chatswood. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>