{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Marshall v Twidale
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Marshall v Twidale
[2021] QCAT 414
Tags
No tags available
Case
Marshall v Twidale
[2021] QCAT 414
•
QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CITATION: Marshall v Twidale [2021] QCAT 414 PARTIES: ALISON MARSHALL (applicant) v HENRY TWIDALE (respondent) APPLICATION NO/S: MCDO1010-21 MATTER TYPE: Other minor civil dispute matters DELIVERED ON: 22 November 2021 HEARING DATE: 18 October 2021 HEARD AT: Brisbane DECISION OF: Adjudicator Marshall ORDERS: 1. The Respondent must remove the attachment to the Applicant’s fence and reinstate that part of the fence which he removed within 21 days of the date of this order. 2. If Order 1 is not complied with the Applicant is entitled to have the work performed by a suitably licensed contractor. 3. Should the Applicant be required to carry out work to reinstate that part of the sufficient dividing fence removed by the Respondent in default of it being done by the Respondent, the suitably licensed contractor shall be entitled to enter the Respondent’s property to carry out the work subject to the Applicant giving 14 days written notice of that intention to the Respondent. 4. The costs incurred by the Applicant in engaging a suitably licensed contractor to reinstate the sufficient dividing fence in default of the Respondent reinstating it are recoverable from the Respondent as a debt without further notice to the Respondent. 5. The Respondent to pay to the Applicant the amount of $27.90, being the filing fee for the Application, within 7 days of the date of this order. 6. Liberty to apply. CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS – QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – where...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Marshall v Twidale
[2021] QCAT 414
•
QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CITATION: Marshall v Twidale [2021] QCAT 414 PARTIES: ALISON MARSHALL (applicant) v HENRY TWIDALE (respondent) APPLICATION NO/S: MCDO1010-21 MATTER TYPE: Other minor civil dispute matters DELIVERED ON: 22 November 2021 HEARING DATE: 18 October 2021 HEARD AT: Brisbane DECISION OF: Adjudicator Marshall ORDERS: 1. The Respondent must remove the attachment to the Applicant’s fence and reinstate that part of the fence which he removed within 21 days of the date of this order. 2. If Order 1 is not complied with the Applicant is entitled to have the work performed by a suitably licensed contractor. 3. Should the Applicant be required to carry out work to reinstate that part of the sufficient dividing fence removed by the Respondent in default of it being done by the Respondent, the suitably licensed contractor shall be entitled to enter the Respondent’s property to carry out the work subject to the Applicant giving 14 days written notice of that intention to the Respondent. 4. The costs incurred by the Applicant in engaging a suitably licensed contractor to reinstate the sufficient dividing fence in default of the Respondent reinstating it are recoverable from the Respondent as a debt without further notice to the Respondent. 5. The Respondent to pay to the Applicant the amount of $27.90, being the filing fee for the Application, within 7 days of the date of this order. 6. Liberty to apply. CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS – QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – where...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>