{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors
[2015] NSWLEC 197
Tags
No tags available
Case
Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors
[2015] NSWLEC 197
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors [2015] NSWLEC 197 Hearing dates:10, 11 and 20 November 2015; written submissions on owner’s consent by 11 December 2015Decision date: 16 December 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Moore AJ Decision: At [260] to [268] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENTS - challenge to validity - whether correct consideration of time limit in clause in Local Environmental Plan - whether failure to consider sufficiently or at all a relevant mandatory consideration - whether objector denied procedural fairness - whether consideration of an irrelevant matter infected the Council’s decision - whether owner’s consent validly given - whether the Council failed to deal with the need for a building application appropriately prior to granting development consent - Council failed to consider relevant mandatory matter - no valid owner’s consent - development consents void. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Local Government Act 1993 Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Bismag Limited v Amblins (Chemists) Limited [1940] 1 Ch 667 Botany Bay City Council v Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 364; 111 LGERA 446 Dibbins v Dibbins [1896] 2 Ch 348 Ireland v Cessnock (1999) NSWLEC 153; 103 LGERA 285 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Prime Constructions Pty Ltd v Westbridge Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 22 ACLC 1390 Project Blue Sky Limited v The Australian...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors
[2015] NSWLEC 197
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Marshall Rural Pty Limited v Hawkesbury City Council and Ors [2015] NSWLEC 197 Hearing dates:10, 11 and 20 November 2015; written submissions on owner’s consent by 11 December 2015Decision date: 16 December 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Moore AJ Decision: At [260] to [268] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENTS - challenge to validity - whether correct consideration of time limit in clause in Local Environmental Plan - whether failure to consider sufficiently or at all a relevant mandatory consideration - whether objector denied procedural fairness - whether consideration of an irrelevant matter infected the Council’s decision - whether owner’s consent validly given - whether the Council failed to deal with the need for a building application appropriately prior to granting development consent - Council failed to consider relevant mandatory matter - no valid owner’s consent - development consents void. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Local Government Act 1993 Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Bismag Limited v Amblins (Chemists) Limited [1940] 1 Ch 667 Botany Bay City Council v Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 364; 111 LGERA 446 Dibbins v Dibbins [1896] 2 Ch 348 Ireland v Cessnock (1999) NSWLEC 153; 103 LGERA 285 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Prime Constructions Pty Ltd v Westbridge Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 22 ACLC 1390 Project Blue Sky Limited v The Australian...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>