{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] HCA 70
Tags
No tags available
Case
Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] HCA 70
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJMAGGBURY PTY LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDHAFELE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD & ANOR RESPONDENTSMaggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 7013 December 2001B36/2001ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentation:S J Lee for the appellants (instructed by O'Shea Corser & Wadley)J S Douglas QC with G C McGowan for the respondents (instructed by Aitken Walker & Strachan)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMaggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty LtdContract – Confidential information – Contractual restraint upon use of "Information" – Restraint expressed to be perpetual – Information disclosed in patent application – Proper construction of contract – Whether restraint to apply once information disclosed to public – Whether contract in restraint of trade.Restraint of trade – Contractual restraint upon use of information concerning invention – Whether confidentiality agreement constitutes an unenforceable contractual restriction on trade – Whether the restraint imposed is more than that required to protect the interests of the parties.Injunction – Confidentiality agreement between inventor and potential marketer – Substantial copying of invention found contrary to agreement – Whether injunction granted unacceptably wide – Whether injunction would involve excessive supervision by court – Permissible scope and duration of injunctive relief.Words and phrases – "quality of confidence".GLEESON CJ, GUMMOW AND HAYNE JJ. Mr G W Allen is a director of the first appellant, Maggbury Pty Ltd ("Maggbury"). It appears from...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] HCA 70
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJMAGGBURY PTY LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDHAFELE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD & ANOR RESPONDENTSMaggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 7013 December 2001B36/2001ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of QueenslandRepresentation:S J Lee for the appellants (instructed by O'Shea Corser & Wadley)J S Douglas QC with G C McGowan for the respondents (instructed by Aitken Walker & Strachan)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSMaggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty LtdContract – Confidential information – Contractual restraint upon use of "Information" – Restraint expressed to be perpetual – Information disclosed in patent application – Proper construction of contract – Whether restraint to apply once information disclosed to public – Whether contract in restraint of trade.Restraint of trade – Contractual restraint upon use of information concerning invention – Whether confidentiality agreement constitutes an unenforceable contractual restriction on trade – Whether the restraint imposed is more than that required to protect the interests of the parties.Injunction – Confidentiality agreement between inventor and potential marketer – Substantial copying of invention found contrary to agreement – Whether injunction granted unacceptably wide – Whether injunction would involve excessive supervision by court – Permissible scope and duration of injunctive relief.Words and phrases – "quality of confidence".GLEESON CJ, GUMMOW AND HAYNE JJ. Mr G W Allen is a director of the first appellant, Maggbury Pty Ltd ("Maggbury"). It appears from...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>