{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
LK v Director-General, Department of Community Services
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
LK v Director-General, Department of Community Services
[2009] HCA 9
Tags
No tags available
Case
LK v Director-General, Department of Community Services
[2009] HCA 9
•This content is currently unavailable.
Tags
No tags available
Case
LK v Director-General, Department of Community Services
[2009] HCA 9
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJGUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON AND KIEFEL JJLK APPELLANTANDDIRECTOR-GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES RESPONDENTLK v Director-General, Department of Community Services[2009] HCA 911 March 2009S524/2008ORDER1. Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Family Court made on 24 June 2008 and 4 July 2008 and in their place order that:(a) the appeal to the Full Court be allowed; and(b)the orders of Kay J made on 29 August 2007 be set aside and in their place it be ordered that the application of the Director-General, Department of Community Services made on 15 March 2007 be dismissed.On appeal from the Family Court of AustraliaRepresentationP G Maiden SC with D L Ward for the appellant (instructed by the Legal Aid Commission of NSW)B W Walker SC with V A Hartstein for the respondent (instructed by the Department of Community Services Legal Services Branch)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSLK v Director-General, Department of Community ServicesFamily Law – Children – Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations – Whether children habitually resident in convention country immediately before retention in Australia – Relevance of past and present intentions of each parent – Relevance of habitual residence of each parent – Weighting of relevant criteria – Appropriate time for determining habitual residence.Family Law – Children – Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations – Meaning of "habitually resident" – "habitual residence" distinct from connecting factors of domicile...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>