{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Lismore City Council v Vivian
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Lismore City Council v Vivian
[2016] NSWLEC 108
Tags
No tags available
Case
Lismore City Council v Vivian
[2016] NSWLEC 108
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lismore City Council v Vivian [2016] NSWLEC 108 Hearing dates:23 August 2016Date of orders: 23 August 2016 Decision date: 23 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Pain J Decision: See par [22] Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT – impermissible residential use of caravans and structure without development consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act or approval under the Local Government Act – enforcement orders made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 76A, 118K, 121B Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 23 Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012, cl 4.2B Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005, cll 4, 77 Local Government Act 1993, ss 68, 124, 132 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 40.8 Cases Cited: Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Lismore City Council (Applicant) Tara Vivian (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: M Young (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) SOLICITORS: McCartney Young Lawyers (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/160500EX TEMPORE Judgment These civil enforcement proceedings commenced by Lismore City Council (the Council) concern property at 28 Sandy Point Road, Monaltrie (the Property) where breaches of s 76A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) and s 68 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (LG Act) are alleged to be occurring. The Respondent Ms Vivian owns the Property. The Respondent did not appear at the hearing today and I earlier...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Lismore City Council v Vivian
[2016] NSWLEC 108
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lismore City Council v Vivian [2016] NSWLEC 108 Hearing dates:23 August 2016Date of orders: 23 August 2016 Decision date: 23 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Pain J Decision: See par [22] Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT – impermissible residential use of caravans and structure without development consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act or approval under the Local Government Act – enforcement orders made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 76A, 118K, 121B Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 23 Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012, cl 4.2B Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005, cll 4, 77 Local Government Act 1993, ss 68, 124, 132 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 40.8 Cases Cited: Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Lismore City Council (Applicant) Tara Vivian (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: M Young (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) SOLICITORS: McCartney Young Lawyers (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/160500EX TEMPORE Judgment These civil enforcement proceedings commenced by Lismore City Council (the Council) concern property at 28 Sandy Point Road, Monaltrie (the Property) where breaches of s 76A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) and s 68 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (LG Act) are alleged to be occurring. The Respondent Ms Vivian owns the Property. The Respondent did not appear at the hearing today and I earlier...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>