{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery
[2007] HCA 6
Tags
No tags available
Case
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery
[2007] HCA 6
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJKIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND CRENNAN JJLEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL APPELLANTANDLESLIE MONTGOMERY RESPONDENTLeichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2007] HCA 627 February 2007S188/2006ORDER1. Appeal allowed;2.Set aside so much of paragraph 1 of the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 8 December 2005 as dismissed the appeal to that Court;3.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales for further hearing; and 4. The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal to this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationP R Garling SC with R S Sheldon for the appellant (instructed by Phillips Fox)G T W Miller QC with A R Reoch for the respondent (instructed by Teakle Ormsby Conn)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSLeichhardt Municipal Council v MontgomeryTorts – Negligence – Duty of care – Roads authority – Independent contractor employed by roads authority to perform work on public road – Work not extra-hazardous – Independent contractor performed work negligently – Road user injured – Whether roads authority owed road user a non-delegable duty of care – Common features of relationships attracting non-delegable duties of care in common law of Australia – Whether existence of non-delegable duty of care consistent with Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2005) 206 CLR 512 – Whether exception to general rule that a party is not...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery
[2007] HCA 6
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJKIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND CRENNAN JJLEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL APPELLANTANDLESLIE MONTGOMERY RESPONDENTLeichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2007] HCA 627 February 2007S188/2006ORDER1. Appeal allowed;2.Set aside so much of paragraph 1 of the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 8 December 2005 as dismissed the appeal to that Court;3.Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales for further hearing; and 4. The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal to this Court.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationP R Garling SC with R S Sheldon for the appellant (instructed by Phillips Fox)G T W Miller QC with A R Reoch for the respondent (instructed by Teakle Ormsby Conn)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSLeichhardt Municipal Council v MontgomeryTorts – Negligence – Duty of care – Roads authority – Independent contractor employed by roads authority to perform work on public road – Work not extra-hazardous – Independent contractor performed work negligently – Road user injured – Whether roads authority owed road user a non-delegable duty of care – Common features of relationships attracting non-delegable duties of care in common law of Australia – Whether existence of non-delegable duty of care consistent with Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2005) 206 CLR 512 – Whether exception to general rule that a party is not...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>