{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones
[2013] HCA 35
Tags
No tags available
Case
Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones
[2013] HCA 35
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJLEGAL SERVICES BOARD APPELLANTANDSIMON GILLESPIE-JONES RESPONDENTLegal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones[2013] HCA 3514 August 2013M27/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Order 1 of the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 19 April 2012 be set aside, and, in its place, order that:(a)the appeal from the order made by the County Court of Victoria on 1 April 2011 be allowed; and(b)paragraphs 1–4 of the order made by the County Court on 1 April 2011 be set aside, and, in their place, order that the appeal from the decision of the Legal Services Board made on 20 October 2009 be dismissed. On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationN J Young QC with S R Senathirajah for the appellant (instructed by Legal Services Board)M F Wheelahan SC with M F Fleming SC and B J McCullagh for the respondent (instructed by Billings Cloak)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSLegal Services Board v Gillespie-JonesLegal practitioners – Legal Practitioners Fidelity Fund ("Fidelity Fund") – Barrister briefed by solicitor to appear for client – Money paid into general trust account by client on account of legal costs – Money misappropriated by solicitor – No finding that client instructed solicitor to pay third parties – Whether barrister entitled to claim against Fidelity Fund for unpaid fees. Words and phrases – "default", "failure to pay or deliver trust...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones
[2013] HCA 35
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJLEGAL SERVICES BOARD APPELLANTANDSIMON GILLESPIE-JONES RESPONDENTLegal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones[2013] HCA 3514 August 2013M27/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Order 1 of the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 19 April 2012 be set aside, and, in its place, order that:(a)the appeal from the order made by the County Court of Victoria on 1 April 2011 be allowed; and(b)paragraphs 1–4 of the order made by the County Court on 1 April 2011 be set aside, and, in their place, order that the appeal from the decision of the Legal Services Board made on 20 October 2009 be dismissed. On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationN J Young QC with S R Senathirajah for the appellant (instructed by Legal Services Board)M F Wheelahan SC with M F Fleming SC and B J McCullagh for the respondent (instructed by Billings Cloak)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSLegal Services Board v Gillespie-JonesLegal practitioners – Legal Practitioners Fidelity Fund ("Fidelity Fund") – Barrister briefed by solicitor to appear for client – Money paid into general trust account by client on account of legal costs – Money misappropriated by solicitor – No finding that client instructed solicitor to pay third parties – Whether barrister entitled to claim against Fidelity Fund for unpaid fees. Words and phrases – "default", "failure to pay or deliver trust...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>