Kirzner v Manly Council

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Kirzner v Manly Council [2015] NSWLEC 1220 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 19 May 2015Date of orders: 22 June 2015 Decision date: 22 June 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Aleksandr Kirzner (Applicant) Manly Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Marc Jaku (Applicant) Shneider Steven (Respondent) Solicitors: Jaku Legal (Applicant) Houston Dearn O’Connor (Respondent) File Number(s):10055 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of...