{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Kelly v Warringah Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Kelly v Warringah Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1358
Tags
No tags available
Case
Kelly v Warringah Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1358
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Kelly v Warringah Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1358 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 20 August 2015 Date of Orders: 31 August 2015 Decision Date: 31 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Kelly (Applicant) Warringah Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M. Staunton barrister. (Applicant) Mr S. Patterson solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10427 of 2014 JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Kelly v Warringah Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1358
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Kelly v Warringah Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1358 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 20 August 2015 Date of Orders: 31 August 2015 Decision Date: 31 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Kelly (Applicant) Warringah Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M. Staunton barrister. (Applicant) Mr S. Patterson solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10427 of 2014 JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>